Joe Francis Diced Up by Jayde Nicole Legal Team
by Jacky Jasper
HSK Beats TMZ to a case almost entirely about them

Attorney Ronald Richards once again continues to protect Freedom of Speech.
Today HSK has exclusively obtained and published court documents from the recent SLAPP MOTION hearing in the Jayde Nicole vs. Joe Francis cross-complaint.
Joe Francis of Girls Gone Wild lost his cross-complaint against Jayde Nicole today. Judge Mark V. Mooney of the Los Angeles Superior Court dismissed his complaint against Jayde Nicole for libel, slander, and false light. The Court found that Joe Francis was a public figure and that Ms. Nicole’s comments to the media were protected speech relating to the topic of Mr. Francis objectifying and exploiting young women.
Since Mr. Francis failed to meet his burden of proof that the statements were made with actual malice, the Court dismissed the case finding no actual malice had been proven by Mr. Francis.
Ms. Nicole’s attorney Ronald Richards of Beverly Hills had this to say, “It is a great day when not only is a bully like Joe Francis, a guy who hits women is defeated, but when a court also protects the rights of everyone to speak their mind on important subjects without being afraid of being sued by a rich tyrant.”
Francis is now facing up to $80,000 in attorney’s fees which are mandatory to a prevailing victim of a SLAPP action in California.
Ronald Richards Blog
ORDER GRANTING SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE

The way you beat out TMZ to their own story was classic.
[Reply]
jackyjasper Reply:
February 9th, 2010 at 18:57
Thanks Ron…
[Reply]
Joe doesn’t like to talk about his anal raping…
[Reply]
and Harvey doesnt have shit on Jacky!
[Reply]
I’ve yet too ever see any cross complants or counter suing actually succeed, and thanks for beating TMZ.
[Reply]
I just want to see Jayde’s nude pictures… fuck all this relationship drama!
[Reply]
Who is Jayde Nicole? Did joe francis get her on video tape or something?
[Reply]
Jayde Nicole is so damn HOTT!
[Reply]
[...] From Diary Of A Hollywood Street King: [...]
[...] The low level of legal literacy in this letter is entirely consistent with the fact that a paralegal at a porn company wrote it. Francis has no prospect of winning in any attempt to secure prior restraint of reporting on police investigations, nor damages for the same. His demand is merely characteristic thuggery. If he sues that or any other web site, they should prevail under California’s admirably strong anti-SLAPP statute. You’d think that Francis and his various pseudo-legal flying porn monkeys would know this. After all, it’s been barely three months since he got his ass handed to him on an anti-SLAPP motion when he sued one Jayde Nicole for having the temerity to accuse him of assault after he assaulted her on vid… [...]