- Celebrity Guru - Hollywood Street King
RSS Urban Guru Hollywood Street King on Twitter Official Hollywood Street King Facebook Page

Michael Houston Admits Introducing Whitney To Drugs!

January 29th, 2013

Bobby Brown has long been the person many blamed for introducing Whitney Houston to drugs. Now, almost a year after the legendary singer’s death, a man – who may have been the closest to Whitney – has stepped forward to accept that responsibility.

In his own words, Whitney’s brother – Michael Houston – explained to Oprah though ‘she [Whitney] would always tell me ‘don’t ever let anyone make you feel anyway. I’m a grown woman, and I’m gonna do what I want’, he still deals with the painful reality of being the person who introduced Whitney to crack/cocaine.

According to Michael Houston – who claims to be clean since October – he and Whitney first indulged in crack/cocaine in the 80’s. That was a time when Michael says the drug was far from being frowned upon, and was prevalent in the music business. He says it was also long before Whitney began dating Bobby Brown, and the effects of cocaine use was not yet publicly known.

Here’s what Michael Houston said to Oprah, after accepting the blame for making Whitney’s introduction to drugs:

“We were in our 20’s, we were young, on the road, we had money. It’s painful, ya know. I feel responsible for what I let go so far, ya know.

We were always, like I said, being together most of the time — and she following behind me, ya know, I told her to drive, we played together, ya know… and everything you’re doing together as you’re growing up — and then, when you get into drugs, you do that together too. And it just got out of hand, ya know, just…drugs is rough.”

Here’s what Cissy Houston penned in “Remembering Whitney”, in regards to discovering Whitney and Michael were using together:

“I was shocked, hurt and confused. I didn’t understand it then, and I still don’t.”

Today marks the release of Cissy Houston’s memoir “Remembering Whitney: My Story of Love, Loss and the Night the Music Stopped”.




Leave a Reply

140 Comments on "Michael Houston Admits Introducing Whitney To Drugs!"


Jamaal
May 18, 2013

I can believe Michael introduced her to crack. Whitney first got hooked on cocaine when she was a model so her use was recreational until the late 1980s. Michael said they were in their twenties when they started using crack, so I’m assuming it was around the “Whitney” 1987 era. Michael was already doped up on crack when he introduced Whitney to it since they were close. As for Bobby, yeah he was using cocaine during his New Edition phase and at the time, if you were in a boy band and you were on drugs, they would kick you out. This would’ve been a PR nightmare for a squeaky clean boy band so their management got NE to vote him out. His usage got worse when he married Whitney however. Or I could say their usage got worse when they got together and later married. Bobby didn’t get her on drugs but I definitely think he was no help to himself or his wife. When you’re addicted, the last thing you’re gonna wanna do is help someone, much less your child. No wonder Krissy doesn’t trust anyone.

[Reply]

crazychris
February 3, 2013

bobbi k being molested if it’s true it’s not shocking hollywood has a bad history of letting their kids be raped, and molestyed.

how many other famous kids been touched and noone was brought to justice.

bobby and whit being strung out probaly let stuff happen and they told bk not to say nothing or they would take her from them and they was already making negative headlines anyway.

lots of junkies let folks sleep qwith their kids for drugs, and money.

rain pryor was molested her dad richard did’nt give a damn strung out as he was.

[Reply]

Keepitrealnotkeepinitreal
February 3, 2013

The last thing a drinker wants is to be with a non drinker. They dont want to be judged constantly. Same with junkies. Junkies seek out other junkies. They keep each others secrets better than non users.

[Reply]

Anonymous Reply:

That’s why Whitney was with Ray J in the end.
“Junkies seek out other junkies”

[Reply]

Anonymous
February 3, 2013

That’s why Whitney was with Ray J in the end.
“Junkies seek out other junkies”

[Reply]

dee
February 2, 2013

Ditto, I believe in life after after death. Whitney believed in heaven as I do. Now it all comes down to what Your definition of heaven is. My personal belief is that we are all spirtual beings and God is spirit and resides in all of us. However I am not doing my ancestors any injustice because my belief system is based on what was taught to me BY MY ANCESTORS. The bottom line my intent is that Whitney has PEACE wherever her spirit may be.

Be Blessed! Dee

[Reply]

Astris
January 30, 2013

I do remember very clearly when the DPCFS paid a visit and they were allowed in and they did speak to Bobbi Kristina at school a few times and then closed the case.
As awful as BB is I do not believe he would allow someone to molest his child and not beat the devout of them. That is the one thing I give him credit for.
It would not surprise me one bit if Pat Houston turned them in. But they did speak to Whitney and the child.

Based on everything I know and my background I want to know when a decent investigation will be done. This woman was killed and the culprits are close by home.

[Reply]

MeMyselfAndI Reply:

Not initially. If you remembered so much did you remember when the administrator referred the case to Special Investigations because the family was being uncooperative. Also, BK WAS NOT interviewed at school.

[Reply]

Anonymous Reply:

Stop talking. Shut up. You are playing a very dangerous game. If what you say is true, it is ILLEGAL for you to be sharing this information. Do you want to get found out?

[Reply]

porcelain doll Reply:

No its not illegal what he or she is saying. All court cases are public knowledge. And transcripts are by federal law accessible to the public. Tax payer dollars pay for these services so the tax payer read and see what’s going on in any federal, local or state agency in which he or she pays taxes in. Most ppl payall 3. At any rate, private funded things are off limits to the general public though, unless the theirs a warrant issued which will make it public business then. Seeing that tax payer dollars pay for the judge who signs the warrant, the law agencies involved and such. That’s why most cases are deemed “the people vs who ever is on trial” example: “the people of south Dakota vs John doe” the people being the citizens of said place. So all finds and contents thereof are public knowledge.. So no worries @Me,Myself&I you only telling what’s already potentially public knowledge honey, these ignorant assed don’t know any better

[Reply]

porcelain doll Reply:

Additionally these agencies are serving to public capacity. And unless theirs a gag ordered issued during the time of the cases investigation this person can share what they want to about this case. And being that this happened over a decade ago I’m sure the time limits have expired and the statue of limitations for a penalty are as well.

[Reply]

MeMyselfAndI
January 30, 2013

Not initially. If you remembered so much did you remember when the administrator referred the case to Special Investigations because the family was being uncooperative. Also, BK WAS NOT interviewed at school.

[Reply]

Anonymous
January 31, 2013

Stop talking. Shut up. You are playing a very dangerous game. If what you say is true, it is ILLEGAL for you to be sharing this information. Do you want to get found out?

[Reply]

porcelain doll
February 3, 2013

No its not illegal what he or she is saying. All court cases are public knowledge. And transcripts are by federal law accessible to the public. Tax payer dollars pay for these services so the tax payer read and see what’s going on in any federal, local or state agency in which he or she pays taxes in. Most ppl payall 3. At any rate, private funded things are off limits to the general public though, unless the theirs a warrant issued which will make it public business then. Seeing that tax payer dollars pay for the judge who signs the warrant, the law agencies involved and such. That’s why most cases are deemed “the people vs who ever is on trial” example: “the people of south Dakota vs John doe” the people being the citizens of said place. So all finds and contents thereof are public knowledge.. So no worries @Me,Myself&I you only telling what’s already potentially public knowledge honey, these ignorant assed don’t know any better

[Reply]

porcelain doll
February 3, 2013

Additionally these agencies are serving to public capacity. And unless theirs a gag ordered issued during the time of the cases investigation this person can share what they want to about this case. And being that this happened over a decade ago I’m sure the time limits have expired and the statue of limitations for a penalty are as well.

[Reply]

 



WHO IS JACKY TALKING ABOUT

WHO IS JACKY TALKING ABOUT



HSK Exclusive



EXPOSED


Mobitalent App